INTERNAL AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION

INTRODUCTION

• The word “aid” means help or assistance.
• So, “aid to construction” means the help courts use to understand an unclear or ambiguous word in a law.
• The main purpose of interpretation is to find the true intention of the Legislature from the words used in the law.
• If the words are unclear or ambiguous, courts must interpret them to remove the confusion.
• When a word has more than one possible meaning, the court must decide which meaning fits best in that context.
• To find the correct meaning, courts may look at all possible meanings and choose the one that matches the legislative intent.
• For this, courts may take help from:
  • the text of the same statute,
  • other related statutes or documents,
  • or the background and facts behind the law.
• This type of help in interpretation is called “aid to construction.”

WHEN CAN AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION BE INVOKED?

• Where the words used in a provision have more than one possible meaning.
• Where there is uncertainty about the meaning of a word.
• Where a particular word is not clear, which meaning should be chosen based on the group of words used in the provision.
• Where a word has several meanings, and the provision can be understood in different reasonable ways.
• When multiple interpretations of the language are possible, the court must choose which one should be accepted.
• When giving the words their simple, ordinary meaning leads to absurd or unintended results.
• When using the plain meaning leads to conclusions that go against the policy or purpose of the law.
• When the natural meaning of the words does not support the legislative intent, or fails to fulfill the object of the statute.

KINDS OF AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION

• Aids to construction can come from two main sources:
  1. From the same statute, and
  2. From outside sources, like other laws or documents.
• When courts use help from the same statute, they look at parts such as the title, preamble, headings, definitions, provisos, and explanations to understand an unclear word.
• In this method, courts do not look outside the statute and stay within the same law being interpreted.
• These kinds of aids are called Internal Aids to Construction.
• If the ambiguity still remains after using internal aids, courts may look at other statutes or relevant documents for clarity.
• Such help taken from outside sources is known as External Aids to Construction.

In Commissioner of Customs v. Dilip Kumar & Co., the Supreme Court (five-judge bench) held that statutes can be interpreted using general principles, internal aids, and external aids.

Internal aids include things found within the same Act, such as:

• Title
• Preamble
• Definition or Interpretation Clause
• Headings
• Marginal notes
• Punctuation Marks
• Illustrations
• Provisos
• Explanations
• Schedules

External aids come from outside the Act, such as:

• Parliamentary debates
• Legislative history
• Other related statutes.

INTERNAL AIDS TO CONSTRUCTION

• Parts of the same statute used by courts to interpret its provisions are called internal aids to construction.
• These aids can be used when there is ambiguity or confusion in the wording of a provision.
• The text and different parts of the statute help in finding the correct meaning of an unclear word.
• When the language of a provision is unclear, and the Legislature’s intention cannot be understood directly, the court must read the entire statute as a whole.
• Following the principle of ex visceribus actus, every part of the statute can be used to understand the true meaning.

The different parts of a statute that act as internal aids to construction, and how they help in interpretation, are explained below.

1. TITLE

• The title of a statute is an important part and appears at the top of the Act.
• Earlier, the title was not considered part of the law, but now courts accept it as useful for understanding the general purpose and scope of the statute.
• Justice S.R. Das noted that the title can help in interpretation but cannot override the clear meaning of the law.
• Like any book title, a statute’s title gives a basic idea of its subject matter, but the true nature of the law depends on its substance, not just the title.
• The title can guide interpretation, but it cannot restrict or change the plain meaning of the provision.
• Statutes usually have two types of titles:
  • Short Title
  • Long Title

Short Title

• The short title is like a nickname of the Act.
• It helps in identifying the Act, not describing it.
• Examples:
  • The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
  • The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
  • The Consumer Protection Act, 1986
  • Indian Contract Act, 1872

Long Title

• The long title appears below the short title and before the preamble.
• It usually begins with “An Act…” and tells the purpose of the legislation.
• Examples:
  • CrPC, 1973: “An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to criminal procedure.”
  • The Supreme Court Advocates Act, 1951: “An Act to authorize Advocates of the Supreme Court to practice as of right in any High Court.”
  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986: long title shows its aim to protect consumer interests and establish authorities for dispute settlement.
  • CPC, 1908: “An Act to consolidate and amend law relating to the procedure of civil courts”.

Use of the Title for resolving an ambiguity

Kedarnath v. State of West Bengal

Facts

• Section 4 of the West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1949, was challenged.
• The section allowed the State Government to choose which cases should be sent to special courts and tried under a special procedure.
• The Act was challenged in the Supreme Court for allegedly violating Article 14 (Right to Equality).
• The long title of the Act showed its purpose: “to provide for a more speedy trial and more effective punishment of certain offences.”

Judgment

• Based on this long title, the Supreme Court held that giving discretion to the State Government was consistent with the purpose of the Act.
• Therefore, the Court dismissed the argument that the Act violated Article 14.

Limitations of Title as Internal Aid to Construction

• The title is not useful when the words of the statute are clear, precise, and have only one meaning.
• The title can be used for interpretation only when the language is ambiguous and open to more than one meaning.
• The title cannot be used to limit or narrow the plain meaning of the statute.
• The title cannot override the clear and definite meaning of the enactment.
• The real meaning of the law must be understood from its substance, not just from its title.

2. PREAMBLE

• A preamble appears at the beginning of a statute and is a part of the Act.
• It states the scope, object, purpose, and gives a summary of the law.
• It expresses the Legislature’s intention behind making the law.
• It acts as an introduction, showing what the law aims to achieve.
• Example: The Preamble to the Indian Constitution clearly shows the goals of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity.
• The preamble is considered a key to understanding the Legislature’s mind, so it is an admissible internal aid when a provision is ambiguous.
• The Supreme Court has laid down the following principles:
  1. If the language of the Act is clear, the preamble should not be used.
  2. If the meaning or object is unclear, the preamble may be used to explain it.
  3. Interpretation cannot start with the preamble, but it can be referred to when the wording is ambiguous.
• According to Lord Normand, the preamble and the enactment may not always match exactly; the enactment may go beyond or fall short of the preamble, but the preamble still gives useful indications.
• The preamble helps find the meaning of words, understand the legislative intent, and resolve ambiguity where the enacting part is unclear or open to multiple meanings.

Judicial Views

1. In re Kerala Education Bill, 1957 – The Court said that the policy and purpose of a law can be understood from its preamble.

2. Global Energy Ltd. v. CERC – The Court held that the object of a law should be interpreted in light of its preamble.

3. Thangal Kunju Musaliar v. Venkatachalam – The Supreme Court stated that the preamble helps in knowing the aims and objects of the legislation.

4. Sita Devi v. State of Bihar – The Court said that the preamble may be used as an aid to interpretation when a provision is ambiguous.

5. Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta – The Supreme Court held that the preamble is helpful to understand legislative intent, but it cannot override clear and unambiguous words of the statute.

6. Maharashtra Land Development Corporation v. State of Maharashtra – The preamble was described as a guiding light for interpreting the Act.

Limitations of the Preamble as Internal Aid to Construction

1. The preamble cannot be used when the words of the statute are clear, precise, and have only one meaning.
2. The preamble can be referred to only when the language is ambiguous and open to more than one interpretation.
3. The preamble cannot narrow or widen the meaning of the words in the main provision.
4. The preamble may show the general purpose of the Act, but cannot override the actual provisions.
5. If there is a conflict between the preamble and a section, the section prevails.
6. A provision cannot be struck down just because it does not match the preamble.
7. The preamble cannot be used to control or change the clear language of the enactment.
8. The preamble is not a source of any legal power, prohibition, or restriction.

3. DEFINITION OR INTERPRETATION CLAUSE

• Most modern laws include definitions at the beginning.
• Example: Section 2(3) of the CPC defines a “decree-holder” as a person in whose favour a decree or executable order has been passed.
• A definition clause gives the meaning of words used in the statute to remove uncertainty.
• Once a word is defined in the Act, it must be given the same meaning everywhere in the statute, as long as the context is the same.
• Because definitions help in interpretation, this part of a statute is also called the interpretation clause.
• The purpose of a definition clause is to clarify the meaning and scope of terms used in the law.
• It lists the words or expressions used in the Act and explains the subjects or matters to which they apply.
• This avoids the need to repeat explanations every time the word appears in the statute.
• It is common for the Legislature to include such clauses, and the best guide to a word’s meaning is the definition provided in the statute itself.

Indian City Properties Ltd. v. Municipal Commissioner of Greater Bombay

The Supreme Court held that the word “building” in Section 299(1) of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, should be interpreted using the definition in Section 3(s) unless expressly or impliedly excluded. The definition, being inclusive, is to be construed broadly.

Kinds of definitions

• Definitions in statutes use either “means” or “includes”, which determines their type.
• “Means” definitions are called Restrictive or Exhaustive definitions – they limit the meaning to what is specifically stated.
• “Includes” definitions are called Inclusive or Extensive definitions – they cover the stated meaning and also other things of a similar nature.

Restrictive or Exhaustive definition

• A definition using the word “means” is called a restrictive or exhaustive definition.
• It limits the meaning strictly to what is stated and covers all possible aspects, leaving no scope for additional meanings.
• Examples:
  • “India” in Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – excludes Jammu & Kashmir.
  • “Deficiency” in Section 2(g) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – faults or shortcomings in a service.
• In Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd. v. Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Board, the Supreme Court held that “means” excludes any meaning other than what is clearly stated.

Inclusive or Extensive definition

• A definition using the word “includes” is an inclusive or extensive definition, meaning it broadens the ordinary meaning and allows additional similar items to be covered.
• It does not limit the meaning to what is listed; instead, it expands the scope to include things of the same genus or nature.
• Example: “Court” under Section 3, Evidence Act includes judges, magistrates, and others authorized to take evidence; similarly, “Place” in CrPC includes houses, buildings, vehicles, etc.
• In State of Bombay v. Hospital Mazdoor Sabha, the words used in the inclusive definition of “Industry” in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, denote extension and cannot be treated as restrictive in any sense.

Exception to the general rule that “Means is exhaustive” and Includes is Extensive

• Generally, the use of “means” makes a definition exhaustive, while “includes” makes it extensive and open-ended.
• However, in certain exceptional cases, courts have held that even when the statute uses “includes”, the definition may still be exhaustive, interpreting it as “means and includes.”
• This occurs when the legislative intent shows that no further addition beyond the listed items was intended.

Case laws

Bharat Coop. Bank (Mumbai) Ltd. v. Coop. Bank Employees Union

The Supreme Court held use of the words “means” followed by the word “includes” in the definition is clearly indicative of legislative intent to make the definition exhaustive.

CIT v. G.R. Karthikeyan

The Supreme Court held that the definition of “income” in Section 2(24) of the Income Tax Act is inclusive, not exhaustive. Therefore, even amounts not listed in the clauses—such as prize money from a motor rally—can still be treated as taxable income.

Jagir Singh v. State of Bihar

It was held that the use of words “means and includes” indicates an exhaustive explanation of meaning which much invariably be attached to these words or expressions.

4. HEADINGS

• In all modern statutes, generally headings are attached to almost each section.
• Example – Section 437 of the CrPC, 1973, is “When bail may be taken in case of non-bailable offence.”
• Headings are placed before a section or a group of sections in a statute.
• Headings are of two kinds: those are
  • Prefixed to a section
  • Prefixed to a group or set of sections
• They may be used as an aid to interpret the section that follows.
• Some jurists treat headings like a preamble that helps understand the purpose of the provisions under it.
• Others believe headings should be used only when the language of the section is unclear or ambiguous.
• A heading can help remove doubt and reveal the true legislative intent when the provision is not clear.
• If there is a conflict between the plain meaning of the section and the heading, the section always prevails.
• Headings cannot be used when the language of the provision is clear and unambiguous.
• They cannot reduce or expand the plain meaning of the words in the section.
• A heading of one section or group of sections cannot be used to interpret a different section or group.

N.C. Dhoundial v. Union of India

It was held that “Heading” can be relied upon to clear the doubt or ambiguity in the interpretation of the provision and to discern the legislative intent.

Union of India v. National Federation of the Blind

The Supreme Court held that headings can be used only to remove ambiguity, but they cannot control or override the clear and unambiguous language of the section.

Limitations

1. Headings cannot be called in aid if the words are precise and unambiguous and capable of bearing only one meaning.
2. Headings can be legitimately referred to only when the language of a provision is open to more than one construction due to the uncertain meaning of the words used therein.
3. Headings can neither cut down nor extend the plain meaning and scope of the words used in the enacting part.
4. Headings cannot control the clear and plain meaning of the words of an enactment.
5. The heading of one section or one group of sections cannot be used to interpret another section.

5. MARGINAL NOTES

• Marginal notes are small notes printed beside a section, giving a brief summary of it.
• They are not a reliable aid for interpretation because they are usually added by draftsmen, not enacted by the Legislature.
• Therefore, marginal notes do not have legal authority and cannot change or limit the meaning of the actual provision.
• Marginal notes in the Constitution are an exception, as they were part of the original text passed by the Constituent Assembly and may be used for interpretation.
• Marginal notes can be used only when the section is ambiguous, but they cannot override clear and precise language of a provision.

Limitations

• Marginal notes are rarely used to interpret a statute because they are not considered strong aids in construction.
• Only the marginal notes approved by the Legislature can be used for interpretation.
• If the words in a section are clear and have only one meaning, marginal notes should not be used to interpret it.
• Marginal notes can be used only when the language is unclear or ambiguous and more than one meaning is possible.
• Marginal notes cannot override or change the plain meaning of the words in the section.
• A marginal note can help interpret only the specific section it belongs to, not any other section.
• Marginal notes cannot weaken or defeat the effect of a clear provision in the statute.

6. PUNCTUATION MARKS

• Punctuation marks (comma, full stop, colon, etc.) help convey the correct meaning of a sentence; changing them can change the meaning.
• In statutes, punctuation may give some indication of the Legislature’s intention, especially when the meaning is doubtful.
• However, punctuation is considered a minor aid, and some jurists believe it should not be relied upon for interpretation.
• If punctuation conflicts with the clear intention of the statute, it can be ignored.
• Punctuation cannot change, reduce, or expand the plain and clear meaning of the words in a provision.

Mohd. Shabhir v. State of Maharashtra

• The Court interpreted Section 27 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act regarding the phrases “manufactures for sale, sells, stocks or exhibits for sale.”

Issue:
Whether “stocks” should be read independently or as “stocks for sale” based on the placement of punctuation marks.

Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that because there is no comma after “stocks”, the correct reading is “stocks or exhibits for sale”, meaning only stocking for sale (not mere stocking) amounts to an offence under Section 27.

7. ILLUSTRATION

• Illustrations are added to some sections of a statute to explain the law through examples.
• Their purpose is to make the meaning of the section clearer by showing how it works in practice.
• Illustrations are useful and valid aids because they help understand the principle behind the section.
• They are not part of the main section, but they still have importance when interpreting the law.
• Therefore, illustrations should not be rejected or ignored unless absolutely necessary.
• They may be referred to when the language of the section is ambiguous.
• However, illustrations cannot override, change, or defeat the actual wording of the section.
• They cannot limit or expand the scope of the section.
• They also cannot reduce the effect of a clear and unambiguous provision.

Anirudha v. Administrator General of Bengal

• The issue was whether Section 115 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applies only to members of a class existing at the time of the testator’s death.
• The court held that the section is wide in scope and not limited to such members.
• It was observed that illustrations cannot restrict the clear meaning of a statutory provision.
• Sir Madhavan Nair stated that illustrations should explain the section, not curtail rights clearly conferred by its plain words.

Limitations of Illustration as Internal Aid to Construction

• Illustrations are of little use for interpretation as they are not considered to be a part of the statute.
• Illustrations cannot be resorted to for construing a provision if the words of that provision are sufficiently clear, plain and precise and give out only one meaning.
• Illustrations can be called in aid only when language is ambiguous and more than one construction is possible.
• Illustrations cannot control the plain meaning of words of the enactment.
• Illustrations cannot be used to curtail or expand the ambit of the section which alone forms an enactment.
• Illustration cannot have the effect of modifying the language of the section.
• Illustrations cannot frustrate the effect of a clear provision.
• Illustrations cannot control the real context of the section and in case of repugnancy between the illustration and section, it is the section, it is the section that will prevail.

8. PROVISO

• In many statutes, after the main provision, a clause beginning with “Provided that …” is added.
• This clause is called a proviso.
• A proviso generally creates an exception to the main provision.
• It operates only when certain conditions are fulfilled.
• In Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, the main provision fixes a 30-day time limit to appeal to the Supreme Court.
• The proviso allows the Supreme Court to accept an appeal after 30 days if sufficient cause is shown.
• Thus, the proviso relaxes the main rule under specific circumstances.
• The main purpose of a proviso is to limit, qualify, or exclude something from the main provision.
• Without the proviso, the matter covered by it would have fallen within the main section.
• A proviso removes certain cases from the general operation of the section.
• The main section and its proviso must be read together.
• The enacting part cannot be interpreted independently of the proviso.
• Both help in understanding the true intention of the legislature.

In Union of India v. Sanjay Kumar Jain, the function of the proviso was declared to be that it qualifies or carves out an exception to the main provision.

C.I.T., Mysore v. Indo Mercantile Bank Ltd.

• The issue before the court concerned the nature and function of a proviso in a statute.
• Justice Kapur observed that the proper function of a proviso is to qualify the general rule laid down in the main enactment.
• A proviso creates an exception by excluding certain matters from the main provision.
• The court held that, but for the proviso, the excluded matter would have fallen within the scope of the main enactment.

T.M. Kanniyan v. I.T.O., Pondicherry, AIR 1968 SC 637

• The Supreme Court interpreted Article 240(1) of the Constitution of India along with its proviso.
• Article 240(1) gives the President power to make regulations for the peace, progress, and good government of Union Territories.
• The proviso states that the President cannot make regulations after the constitution of a Legislature for that Union Territory.
• It was argued that because of the proviso, the President’s power is limited and co-extensive with the Legislature, confined to the State and Concurrent Lists.
• The Supreme Court rejected this argument.
• The Court held that the main enacting part of Article 240(1) clearly confers wide powers on the President.
• The proviso does not curtail or restrict the scope of the power granted by the main provision.
• Thus, a proviso cannot limit the plain and clear meaning of the substantive provision.

Limitations of Proviso as Internal Aid to Construction

• A proviso must be read only in relation to the section to which it is attached.
• A proviso attached to one section or sub-section cannot be applied to another section or sub-section.
• It cannot be used to add to or take away anything from some other section.
• In Union of India v. Dileep Kumar Singh, the court held that although a proviso does not go beyond the section to which it is attached, the whole section, including the proviso, must be read together.
• The section and proviso should explain each other and be interpreted harmoniously.
• If the main provision is clear, the proviso cannot be used to cancel or override it.
• A proviso cannot add something new or remove something by implication when the main provision is clear.
• The scope of the main section cannot be increased or reduced by using the proviso.
• A proviso should not defeat or frustrate the real purpose of the main provision, unless the language of the proviso clearly requires it.
• A proviso cannot introduce something into the main provision which is not already present in it.

9. EXPLANATION

• In some sections, an Explanation is added after the main provision.
• An explanation is treated as a part of the statute itself.
• An explanation may be added for various reasons, such as:
  • To explain the meaning of words used in the section.
  • To remove doubts or confusion.
  • To clarify ambiguity or vagueness in the provision.
  • To include or exclude something from the scope of the main provision.
  • To make clear what is implied in the section.
  • To make obvious what was hidden or unclear.
• While interpreting a provision, the explanation must not be ignored.
• The main purpose of an explanation is to explain, not to expand or widen the scope of the section or rule.
• An explanation should be read in a way that harmonizes with the main provision and clears any ambiguity.
• It should be limited to the purpose for which it was added.
• The explanation should not be stretched beyond its proper role.
• An explanation cannot reduce or increase the scope of the main section.
• It cannot override the clear meaning of the words used in the section.
• It also cannot change or modify the language of the main provision.

10. SCHEDULES

• In many statutes, Schedules are added at the end of the enactment.
• For example, Schedules are appended to the CrPC, 1973 and CPC, 1908.
• Schedules form a part of the statute itself.
• They usually explain how rights under the Act are to be enforced or how statutory powers are to be exercised.
• Schedules are placed at the end to avoid overloading the main sections with too many details.
• They mainly contain procedural details, forms, and guidelines to implement the policy of the Act.
• The division of a statute into Sections and Schedules is only for convenience.
• Generally, less importance is given to Schedules compared to sections.
• However, when the wording of a section is unclear or doubtful, the Schedule can be used to clarify its meaning.
• In Biman Basu v. Kallol Guha Thakurta, the court held that Schedules, forms, and appendices are part of the statute or rules, as the case may be.

CONCLUSION

Internal aids to construction play a very important role in statutory interpretation. When the language of a statute is clear and unambiguous, courts give effect to its plain meaning. However, when ambiguity, uncertainty, or doubt arises, internal aids such as the title, preamble, definitions, headings, marginal notes, punctuation, illustrations, provisos, explanations, and schedules help the courts understand the true intention of the Legislature.

These aids form part of the statute itself and provide valuable guidance in resolving confusion and ensuring a harmonious reading of the law. At the same time, courts have consistently held that internal aids cannot override, expand, or restrict the clear and express words of a provision. They are meant to explain, clarify, and assist—not to rewrite the law.

Thus, internal aids to construction ensure that statutes are interpreted in a meaningful, logical, and purpose-oriented manner, while respecting the limits set by the Legislature. They help courts achieve justice by giving effect to the real object and spirit of the law.

Reference

1. Interpretation of Statutes by D.N. Mathur, 16^th Edition.

Read Latest posts The Bharat Law